{"id":470,"date":"2006-03-24T02:54:57","date_gmt":"2006-03-24T01:54:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dickonedwards.co.uk\/diary\/index.php\/archive\/brokeback-mumbling\/"},"modified":"2006-03-24T14:16:24","modified_gmt":"2006-03-24T13:16:24","slug":"brokeback-mumbling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/archive\/brokeback-mumbling\/","title":{"rendered":"Brokeback Mumbling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I finally go to see the film Brokeback Mountain and fail to understand what the fuss is about. I&#8217;ve read the Annie Proulx short story: unusually, you can read the story in less time than it takes to sit through the movie adaptation. Perhaps it&#8217;s because I already know the story, or perhaps it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s more about denial and frustration than love,  but I leave the cinema unmoved to tears save for one moment: and that was the trailer for &#8216;March Of The Penguins&#8217;.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Brokeback&#8217; starts brilliantly: the sexual tension between the two male leads in the first half-hour is truly astounding and genuinely sensual. After that, it becomes a slow, scenically attractive study of macho Mr Ledger&#8217;s failure to accept his feelings. He channels his frustration into manly violence and mumbling (I could have done with subtitles), while doe-eyed Mr Gyllenhaal flutters his long eyelashes at Mexican rent boys by way of compensation for Mr Ledger&#8217;s lack of commitment. <\/p>\n<p>Mr G is more accepting of his nature: he knows the two men are meant to be together, but Mr L insists this is impossible. It doesn&#8217;t help that the latter is haunted by a childhood trauma, where he was shown the grisly results of a local queerbashing. He mumbles &#8216;If you can&#8217;t fix it, you&#8217;ve got to stand it&#8217;, which is also the last line in the Proulx story. <\/p>\n<p>The movie starts out impressively as a celebration of the effect of Mother Nature (you come out whistling the scenery) upon Human Nature, suggesting that gayness is utterly natural and instinctive: literally as old as the hills. Those &#8216;purple-headed mountains&#8217; in the hymn All Things Bright And Beautiful rather spring to mind. Less inneundo-minded, the implicitly Sappho-erotic &#8216;Picnic At Hanging Rock&#8217; could also be compared. Ancient, magnificent, mysterious landscapes tampering with the emotional world of humans. <\/p>\n<p>But then it becomes a rather depressing and old-fashioned tale about the need to deny such feelings once set in motion. It&#8217;s about homophobia, both internalized and institutionalised. It even has a very obvious metaphor for &#8216;closeted&#8217; at the end. And yet, it&#8217;s been presented to the world as nothing to do with gayness per se. This is what really annoys me. <\/p>\n<p>I appreciate that the producers have toned down the actual depiction of homosexuality in order to get as many people to see it as possible. I&#8217;m reminded of Quentin Crisp lamenting that The Naked Civil Servant had to be a TV movie, because a cinema release would have only been seen, as he puts it, &#8216;purely by gay men and liberals wishing to be seen going into and coming out of the cinema.&#8217; For Brokeback, I would add to that list fans of male beauty and women fascinated with gay men (as long as they&#8217;re attractive): I noted most of my fellow cinemagoers were female. <\/p>\n<p>To this end, Brokeback Mountain wants to have its gay protest cake and eat it. The boy-on-boy action and male nudity is kept to a curiously prudish minimum. The director, Mr Lee, seems more interested in showing us the breasts of the protagonists&#8217; wives than the men&#8217;s own nether regions. Why? <\/p>\n<p>All in all, it&#8217;s lovely to look at, and a pretty good adaptation of the original story&#8230; but one which isn&#8217;t all that original.  Worryingly, I&#8217;m most reminded of the groundbreaking 1960 UK film &#8220;Victim&#8221; in which Dirk Bogarde plays a barrister blackmailed into revealing his love for a rent boy.  It&#8217;s not a great film because it&#8217;s too aware that it&#8217;s trying to Do Good in its call for toleration. Likewise with Brokeback Mountain: at face value it&#8217;s smothered by its own message. But even this is smothered in turn by the presentation, distribution and promotional spin telling critics and moviegoers how to interpret the film. Don&#8217;t you dare call it a gay cowboy movie, they instruct, it&#8217;s more about love, pure and simple. Well, that&#8217;s at best missing the point, at worst a promotion of ignorance and negative connotations with homosexuality. <\/p>\n<p>So you either adore Brokeback Mountain as a pretty romance, meaning you&#8217;re not paying too much attention. Or you realise what it&#8217;s actually about, and are then left feeling it&#8217;s a quaint period piece in the old-fashioned &#8216;gayness can come to no good&#8217; ilk.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s certainly not a patch on Mr Lee&#8217;s other movies like the excellent &#8216;The Ice Storm&#8217;. Still,  it IS much better than his previous opus, &#8216;Hulk&#8217;. Another movie with not enough gay sex in for my liking. And why did The Hulk&#8217;s trousers never rip off along with the rest of his clothes? Oh, I&#8217;ve stopped being serious now, haven&#8217;t I. Actually, did you know the reason for the 70s &#8216;Incredible Hulk&#8217; TV series altering Bruce Banner&#8217;s name (as it was in the comic) to David Banner? Because the name &#8216;Bruce&#8217; was thought to be&#8230; too gay. It all links, you know. <\/p>\n<p>Anyone who calls Brokeback Mountain a &#8216;universal love story&#8217; is in denial. About a movie about denial. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I finally go to see the film Brokeback Mountain and fail to understand what the fuss is about. I&#8217;ve read the Annie Proulx short story: unusually, you can read the story in less time than it takes to sit through the movie adaptation. Perhaps it&#8217;s because I already know the story, or perhaps it&#8217;s because [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=470"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dickonedwards.com\/diary\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}